Messages

For white hat - I recommend closing tags from indexing and making them non-sticky, and use for more accurate grouping of content.

For black hat - This is the basis for the generation and uniqueness of content (text with one tag + paragraph with such a tag + feed of a twitter on such and such a tag).

And this is the "white hat" or "black hat" question?

Did you get any notification that the pages will not get indexed?

yes, the client and change no opportunity

So the topic is not about how to fix the already created jambs, but how to prevent them. Extra 5 characters in the address - it's superfluous.

definition of the end of the name of the document is very often used to enable / disable indexing in the robot, especially relevant in the case of directives

This is an artificially created "problem" It is enough to make the correct CNC.

+ in various js handlers it is very convenient to have such a label as a dot

This is generally some kind of hardness.

there are a lot of problems that can be solved much easily with an extension.

For example?

Ida "extension" is the concept of the file system. There is no such concept in the addressing of documents.

HTML

get rid of this rudement.

Tell me please, which of the two options is best suited in this case?

No one. The card must be available one by one.
The canonical is a crutch in this case.

At the moment, the use of non-unique content is permissible on news resources, films, games, etc.

The position of which in TOP is determined mainly by three factors:

1. Authority of the resource.
2. Behavioral factors (before visiting the site (behavior in the search), directly on the site itself (the number of pages viewed and the time spent), the return of users to the site.).
3. Submission and structure of information.

Everything is determined by the quality and competing resources in the issue and is reduced to the fact that the most high-quality and relevant sites are shown.

It's strange that nobody mentioned copyright. It would seem that this should bother more than uniqueness.

Thanks for the reply! We have a small online store and I plan to buy a paid SSL Certificate but confused whether we should opt for it now or use Let's Encrypt for now?

Hello Members,

Would like to know your opinion on this: Does the type of SSL certificate affect the ranking of the site?

Nowadays every website owner is rushing to buy a certificate and go for https to please the search engine. But the question is whether the search engines determine the type of certificate: only the domain is confirmed, or the organization's verification is passed. Logically, we must understand.

What do you guys think about this? Has anyone done any tests?

The better option is to analyze the top 10 sites in your region, then it will be clear what criteria is now considered for ranking the sites. You need to buy links or not can be decided after understanding the parameters.

Thank you, may even suggest how best to check specifically reference mass of competitors? To see specifically where the links are coming from?

Have you performed internal optimization on the website? Also, you have not shared the result of links purchased.

Performed:

1. Meta Tags:

Title: The one direct entry relevant to any particular key pages, selected the mid-range and non-keys. (Sample title muzzle - "countertops for the kitchen made of artificial stone")

Description - similar to titles + add "in India" (Example - "countertops for the kitchen made of artificial stone in India")
Keywords - several relevant keywords.

2. text:

H1 - complete repetition of title
H2, H3 - MF other requests in the text a small number of keys of a title and keywords present.
Structured text (p, tables, lists (with the violas in the form of the same MF key).

Well ... sort generally described)

3. As a result, it bought almost 60 internal links. Of these, approximately 55sht on 200-400, and about 5 pieces of 1500-2500. The top thirty positions raised, the second - not at all. Although the parameters of links/articles/anchor/pages of my site do not change - to do everything myself and is always the same.

Hello,

I am a novice SEO, but with some experience.

After making some changes in the strategy, I am no longer able to understand how to continue to work on the site.

The site is commercial and for India region.

In December 2016, only started to master the purchase links. Doing this gave good growth. Purchased links with direct anchors. Articles written for them were unique, in compliance with a ratio of about 70% (+ brand/naked link) to 30% of direct and partial anchor text (anchor text are not repeated).

Two regular purchase of links according to the same parameters in March and May have failed and there is a drop in several positions.

On the way, a small budget (15-20 thousand), do not know how to master it. I bow again to the links, but the best quality. Let's say for 2000-2500, carefully checking each donor.

What do you think? Please tell me whether I should take this into account or not. And interested in the opinion of all who have something to say based on their own experience in promoting similar sites.

Wait for a couple of weeks or a month, build some quality and relevant backlinks. It will settle down.

Writing a letter does not count worth, we live in an age of e-mails...