Messages

Google will consider them as new pages, and not old (you changed URLs) - will be non-unique content, since old pages, in its algorithms are still alive. 301 should have been updated! Positions can persist strongly, 2 days are not deadline, add redirect to new pages now.

Friends, it all depends on the site's trust. I assure you, if you pour non-unique content on Wikipedia, it will not get worse ranked. 

Save the images in a different format and change the exif metadata. Hope this helps.

I would suggest you to try to find the cause, maybe there are some common places and you can close their indexing at once. If there are not enough pages, I would try to hide them from the index via Google Webmasters Search Console.

Yes, the fact of the matter is that they are all different, and it is not possible to block all the robots, and adding too many redirects is of no use. So I need to know whether I should really fix them, keep it the way is it on the site.

The website is built using WordPress 2 years ago. Have made a couple of changes in structure 3 months ago.

Hello everybody! If in the Errors section of Google webmaster in section, there are URLs that are giving 404 a code error, it is necessary to adjust them by giving proper redirects or is there something else that we need to do? After all, the pages that are listed there are some of those that I do not need. So should I keep it the way it is or need to do something else?

You can solve it by putting a link with the correct one on the desired page.

In your case, on the page "how to put a fence somewhere in the text (preferably at the end) enter the phrase" like you will be interested in how to paint a wooden fence?. "The phrase "how to paint a wooden fence will be an anchor, as the changes get indexed, after 1 -2 weeks everything will rise to the right places.

The main drawback, you have to do everything manually. There is an option, acceleration, using the plugin "similar articles", where H1 will be an anchor, accordingly, it will create such links but you will have to adjust them.

Have you performed internal optimization on the website? Also, you have not shared the result of links purchased.

Tell us, what actions were performed to promote the site and what type of text is updated on the website, what type of links you have built and is the structure of website user-friendly?

4.6.6 version was released on May 16, together with 4.7.5.

https://codex.wordpress.org/Version_4.6.6
https://codex.wordpress.org/Version_4.7.5

long branch of 4.6 is updated with 4.7, you can expect that the vulnerabilities are corrected simultaneously.

Another very, very, very cool link building tactic:

Keyword inurl: wiki
Keyword intitle: wiki

This tactic is used by Wikipedia project called MediaWiki, which is nothing more than users creating their sites from the same Wikipedia template, where we can edit content, and get our link there.

For me I found it very good, I got several links from several different sites all with anchor text very varied and contextualized, gave results!

Hello Rajesh, I did not understand this strategy of getting links with mediawiki very well. Could you explain? Send a message if it is extensive.

If the On-page SEO is already done, then start building more high-quality backlinks (link-building) from high DA sites if possible sites with content from the same area, will help you in getting better positions.

The loading speed is as if you had a negative score or score that although it is negatively influencing, you can compensate for this negative point by doing more link building.

A 700Kb page (almost 1MB) is sure to be negatively influencing SEO.

Does the page have lots of graphics? Are the graphics compressed? (JPG?) I've seen sites that might have been loaded with less time but had much larger .PNG images than their compressed (JPG) counterparts.

Changing the web server to Linux can bring improvement, but not much because the delay may not be caused by the web-server (Linux or Windows) but by the conversions in the middle of the path and if this is really the exchange, it Will advance anything, if I understand the question.

Try to see where the bottleneck is, where it is the point it takes to make the right decision.

Hello, guys,

I'll share a bit of my brief experience with the microdata in the Schema standard.

I gradually implemented the microdata in this pattern and noticed that in the pages that I implanted first there was a more constant and consistent improvement in the positioning of the searches than in the pages that I did not implant "yet". Nothing very conclusive since other factors can influence, but I'm watching.

It's hard work to deploy them but it's nothing more than a deeper and more detailed markup in the html code, the trick depends a lot on how the code is already organized and the volume of content to be tagged, plus the time it took to understand Schema (kkk this name is comedy).

Before testing any schema markup I studied until I understood the way it works and the ways of deployment, I advise anyone who wants to use this markup to do the same. One of the reasons I chose the schema is because it is a default set between search engine companies and easy to deploy to html 5.

In my case the goal is not only to define the ideal Rich Snippet since these pages already work a lot Well with the default page snippet. But rather give more relevance to the deep content so that the search engines understand and when they decide to show the modified snippet that shows an optimized and attractive.

I'm making a new website in html5 that is already with microdata marking from the start, it's looking easier than changing it later. Once you have online and with some results I share here to discuss.