Promotion of non-unique content

[Torreto]

How is your experience in working with non-unique texts?

Do anyone have successful projects living on a copy-paste?

Needless to say, it's not about 100% copy-paste, but slightly reworked for all the seo laws (fitting of key entries, adding h2, lists, attenuation of blocks, images, etc.).

I want to test it on a new project under the CPA, the benefit of time and money is minimal.

Does anyone has any ideas or thoughts on this?

[Suneel]

The main problem is that, you will not find more targeted visitors than there are for the unique content. If the site from where you copied the content is having lesser authority, then the chances on having a better rank might increase.

[Kapil]

Read about parsing content for doorways. With a few tens of thousands of pages, you can get a hundred or two traffic.

[Rajesh]

I will share experience, from the opposite side.

There was a site, filled with unique content. And then, hop, sanctions for something from Google, and eventually a site that stupidly copied the content (ordinary doorway), even with a crippled structure - went to the top instead of my on the "traffic request", pulling up the tails. Then the removal of sanctions through the support of Google, but a website published in the TOP. And the author quickly realized, brought the design, structure and text back to normal.


Conclusion: The stick sometimes shoots

[Roshan]

At the moment, the use of non-unique content is permissible on news resources, films, games, etc.

The position of which in TOP is determined mainly by three factors:

1. Authority of the resource.
2. Behavioral factors (before visiting the site (behavior in the search), directly on the site itself (the number of pages viewed and the time spent), the return of users to the site.).
3. Submission and structure of information.

Everything is determined by the quality and competing resources in the issue and is reduced to the fact that the most high-quality and relevant sites are shown.

[Karaan]

With the correct formation of copy-paste, the site can be very viable. However, it is required to work with several sources. Choose from 5-7 sources (you can more) and collect texts from several. + unique title and h2, h3 tags.

[Amrit]

Friends, it all depends on the site's trust. I assure you, if you pour non-unique content on Wikipedia, it will not get worse ranked.